Skip to content

How it works

How to put mandates to work

An AI agent can do useful work without unlimited permission. It starts with a person granting specific authority, and ends with a named owner for every action that matters.

Think of a mandate as the working agreement between a person and an AI agent. The person defines the job, the limits, and the decisions that must come back to them. The agent contributes within those boundaries. RealMandates is building software to make that agreement part of the workflow, and to keep a clear record of who owns each consequential action.

  1. 1

    Set the mandate

    A named person decides what work an agent is allowed to do, how it shares the work with people, and when it must come back to a person. The mandate carries that person's name.

  2. 2

    Start with the agents you have

    Begin with one agent your team already uses and one kind of work it does.

  3. 3

    Name the decisions that matter

    Agree which actions are consequential: the ones that reach customers, spend money, change records, or speak for the company.

  4. 4

    Bring in the right person

    A budget change, a customer offer, or a pricing exception reaches the accountable owner with the context needed to decide.

  5. 5

    Keep the record

    Every consequential action keeps the signal that started it, the mandate it followed, the decision made, and the person who owns it.

Illustrative example

From buying signal to customer outreach

A target account starts researching a new capability. An agent drafts a personal message to the buyer. Its mandate lets it prepare drafts but not send outreach to strategic accounts without review. The account owner edits one line and approves the send.

Signal
Target account researching a new capability
Mandate
Draft only for strategic account outreach
Decision
Approved with one edit
Owner
Account owner

What a mandate should answer

  • Who granted the authority?
  • What is the agent allowed to do?
  • Which actions need a person first?
  • Who is accountable for the outcome?

One question to bring to a design partner conversation

Pick one real agent workflow in your business. Name the next consequential action it could take. Who can authorize it today? What would the record need to show tomorrow? That is where a useful conversation begins.

Discuss your use case

Why is this more than an approval workflow?

Because the mandate begins before the approval request. It describes the agent's authority, the kinds of work it can perform, the boundary for human judgment, and the accountable person. Approval is one possible step in a broader governed workflow.

Frequently asked questions

No. Routine actions go ahead within the agent's mandate. Only consequential actions wait for a person, and the mandate decides which those are.

Yes. Mandates should be reviewed on a set schedule. Responsibility grows as an agent earns trust and comes down when it does not.

Every action owned, from day one.